The election of Ssalongo Ronald Balimwezo as Kampala Lord Mayor and the stunning defeat of veteran opposition figure Erias Lukwago marks a defining turning point in the political life of Uganda’s capital. After more than a decade in which Lukwago’s leadership was built on confrontation, courtroom battles, and symbolic resistance to central government, Kampala voters have signaled a clear shift toward pragmatic, results-oriented leadership.
The outcome reflects a growing urban demand for service delivery—better roads, cleaner markets, improved waste management, and reduced traffic congestion—over perpetual political protest. Balimwezo’s victory therefore represents not just a change of guard at City Hall, but a broader re-thinking by city residents about how power should be exercised in Kampala and what kind of leadership best serves a rapidly growing metropolitan population.
Big picture? It’s a political earthquake for Kampala.
Balimwezo’s election and Lukwago’s defeat mean several things at once—politically, administratively, and symbolically.
1. End of an era at City Hall
Erias Lukwago had become synonymous with Kampala politics for more than a decade. His defeat signals voter fatigue with permanent opposition figures and a desire for new style leadership, not just loud resistance. Kampala voters are saying: “We want results, not endless battles.”
2. Shift from confrontation to negotiation
Lukwago thrived on confrontation with central government and KCCA technocrats. Balimwezo’s win suggests voters want a Lord Mayor who can negotiate, bargain, and unlock services, not just fight State House. Expect less courtroom politics and more boardroom politics.
3. Protest politics is losing steam in the city
Kampala has long been the heartbeat of opposition and protest politics. This result shows urban voters are becoming more pragmatic—jobs, garbage, traffic, markets, drainage now matter more than symbolism and slogans.
4. Warning shot to long-serving opposition leaders
If Lukwago can fall in Kampala, no seat is truly “safe.” This should worry opposition heavyweights who rely on history, name recognition, and defiance rather than renewal and delivery.
5. Opportunity—and pressure—for Balimwezo
Balimwezo inherits high expectations. Kampala residents didn’t vote for him to make noise; they voted for service delivery. If he fails to improve everyday city life, the same voters will turn on him quickly.
6. Central government quietly wins
Without openly saying it, this outcome eases government–city relations. A less confrontational Lord Mayor makes coordination on roads, markets, and urban planning easier.
Bottom line:
Kampala has voted for pragmatism over protest. Whether that gamble pays off depends entirely on what Balimwezo does next. The honeymoon will be short.
Do you have a story in your community or an opinion to share with us: Email us at Submit an Article
