Over the last several weeks, as agitation over the presidential age limits has seized public debate, Ugandan journalists and media houses have been unfortunate victims of overzealous security personnel keen to stifle particularly the voices of Ugandan citizens opposed to the removal of the age limits.
Some journalists were arrested while they diligently went about their work, and three of them spent a night in a police cell in Lira, while others had their equipment confiscated and only returned to them in the evening. Others were caught up in scuffles with security operatives who wanted to confiscate their equipment, particularly cameras. We insist that practising journalism in Uganda is not a crime.
The cocktail of security agencies involved in suffocating people’s inalienable rights to hold opinions of their choice and to freely express and disseminate them has, regrettably, been helped by no less an institution than the Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), which promises in its tagline to provide “Communication For All”.
On September 26, 2017, UCC ordered broadcasters, especially television stations, “to immediately stop and refrain from broadcasting live feeds” of ongoing debates in Parliament over the age limits that wound up in fistfights. The Commission claimed such broadcasts were in contravention of Section 31 of the Uganda Communications Act, 2013.
Reference to the law not only reveals a gross misreading of it, especially in relation to live broadcasts. More importantly, it demonstrates an erroneous pattern UCC has absorbed itself in. It is the accuser, prosecutor, judge and executioner of media work the Commission and its appointing authority disapprove of not because it contravenes any law but has been adjudged as unpalatable to those who wield state power.
In the days after issuing its order, UCC in cahoots with security persons have followed up radio and television stations and their journalists with calls, threatening and warning them against hosting individuals, particularly Members of Parliament, who hold opposing views to the government.
As a group of 230 practising journalists under the collective Uganda Press Freedom Network, we are dismayed, to say the least, by the conduct of the Commission. We roundly condemn and reject its futile attempts to supress press freedom that it has now made a habit of.
The Commission, more than anybody else, should be at the forefront of protecting and promoting the rights of journalists and media houses in Uganda to operate freely. This is important if for nothing else to fulfil its promise of providing communication for all, which inevitably includes the views they might disagree with for political or other reasons.
The Commission’s core mandate to regulate minimum broadcasting standards DOES NOT include a misreading and misapplication of the law, or stretching its obligations to determine which persons media houses host or what reports they carry. To continue to do so not only undermine its existence, it damages Uganda’s reputation in the world and undercuts its attractiveness as an investment destination. No business entity worth its name is keen to invest in an environment where misreading and misapplication of the law is the norm, as the Commission continually demonstrates.
The Commission ought to know by now that a free press is the cornerstone of a prosperous democracy, which Uganda aspires to and the ruling NRM government has always touted among its signature achievements in its three decades in power to date. A thriving democracy, needless to say, is critical to the nation’s social, economic and political prosperity.
We therefore call upon the Commission to immediately review its conduct and desist from any actions that undercut the media sector that it is set up to promote. To do otherwise is self-defeating at all levels.
We also want to challenge editors, news executives and indeed media owners who interface directly with these most unfortunate demands and actions by UCC and its partners to take a firmer stand in defence of a free press. Their failure to push back strongly against these erroneous directives has a direct effect on our credibility before the public we elect ourselves to inform and educate. Defend your reporters before they are too weak to defend you!
*Gabriel Buule, Carol Beyanga , Benidicta Asiimwe , Isaac Imaka, Haggai Matsiko , Eriasa Mukiibi Sserunjogi*
*On behalf of the 230 members of Uganda Press Freedom Network*
Do you have a story in your community or an opinion to share with us: Email us at email@example.com