• Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Donate
  • Login
Watchdog Uganda
  • Home
  • News
    • National
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Media Outreach Newswire
    • Africa News
    • Tourism
    • Community News
    • Luganda
    • Sports
      • Football
      • Motorsport
  • Op-Ed
    • #Out2Lunch
    • Conversations with
    • Politics
    • Relationships
  • Business
    • Agriculture
    • CEOs & Entrepreneurs,
    • Companies
    • Finance
    • Products
    • RealEstate
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
  • People
    • Showbiz
      • Salon Mag
  • Special Report
    • Education
    • Voices
  • Reviews
    • Products
    • Events
    • Hotels
    • Restaurants
    • Places
  • WD-TV
  • Donate
  • China News
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • National
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Media Outreach Newswire
    • Africa News
    • Tourism
    • Community News
    • Luganda
    • Sports
      • Football
      • Motorsport
  • Op-Ed
    • #Out2Lunch
    • Conversations with
    • Politics
    • Relationships
  • Business
    • Agriculture
    • CEOs & Entrepreneurs,
    • Companies
    • Finance
    • Products
    • RealEstate
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
  • People
    • Showbiz
      • Salon Mag
  • Special Report
    • Education
    • Voices
  • Reviews
    • Products
    • Events
    • Hotels
    • Restaurants
    • Places
  • WD-TV
  • Donate
  • China News
No Result
View All Result
Watchdog Uganda
No Result
View All Result

Here is why Court annulled section 25 of Computer Misuse Act 2011

Stephen Kalema by Stephen Kalema
2 years ago
in National, News
0 0
ShareTweetSendShare

The Constitutional Court presided over by a Coram of five judges has unanimously annulled section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act 2011 and its enforcement with immediate effect.

While delivering their ruling on Tuesday all five Judges Justice Richard Buteera, Justice Kenneth Kakuru, Justice Geoffrey Kiryabwire, Lady Justice Elizabeth Musoke and Lady. Justice Monica Mugenyi agreed that section 25 was unjustifiable since it curtails the freedom of speech in a free and democratic society.

The Petition was brought before the Constitutional Court in 2016 by city lawyers Andrew Karamagi and Robert Shaka challenging Section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act.

The petitioners alleged that Section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act, which declares that it’s an offence for any person to “willfully and repeatedly use electronic communication to disturb or attempt to disturb the peace, quiet or right of privacy of any person with no purpose of legitimate communication” is inconsistent with and in contravention of Article 29(1)(a) of the country’s Constitution.

Meanwhile, Article 29(1) (a)states that; Every person shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, which shall include freedom of the press and other media:

Therefore in their petition, the petitioners wanted the court to declare that; An impugned Section is an insidious form of censorship which restricts the free flow of opinions and ideas essential to sustain the collective life of the citizenry in the digital age. That it is vague and overly broad, and there is no evidence that government could not achieve the intended purpose with less drastic measures.

In his affidavit, lawyer Karamagi informed the court that the impugned Section is also vague because it fails to give proper notice of the conduct it seeks to proscribe and terms such as “disturb or attempt to disturb the peace, quiet or right of privacy” are not defined in the Act, and cannot be conclusively defined by a regular user of the Internet. As a result, the police and governmental authorities will arrest and prosecute otherwise confused citizens in an arbitrary and whimsical manner.

While making his ruling Justice Kakuru asserted that in a democratic and free society, prosecuting people for the content of their communication is a violation of what falls within the guarantees of freedom of expression in a democratic society.

Giving an example of the European Court of Human Rights case of Handysida v UK (References: 5493/72, (1976) 1 EHRR 737, [1976] ECHR 5, he said that it was observed that freedom of expression includes the right to say things that; offend, shock or disturb the state or any sector of the population. he added that the European Court concluded that instituting prosecution in such cases would not be appropriate.

Justice Kakuru also explained that The United Human Right Committee in its general comment 34, stated that any limitation on freedom of expression must be absolutely necessary. ‘According to the United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of expression, States are only permitted to prohibit it through criminal section only for four types of expression under International law. They are child pornography, direct public incitement to genocide, advocacy of national, racial, and religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence and incitement to terrorism

“I find that the impugned Section is unjustifiable as it curtails the freedom of speech in a free and democratic society. Secondly, Section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act No. 2 of 2011 does not specify what conduct constitutes offensive communication. To that extent it does not afford sufficient guidance for legal debate,” he said.

The judge also agreed that the section in question is vague, overly broad and ambiguous. Therefore, he found that the impugned section is inconsistent with and/or in contravention of Article 29 (1,) of the Constitution, Article19 (2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Artcle9 (2) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right.

“I would allow the Petition with costs to the petitioners and make the following declarations and orders: 1. Section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act No. 2 of 2011 is null and void as it is inconsistent and/or in contravention with Article 29 (l) of the Constitution. 2. The enforcement of Section 25 of the Computer Misuse Act No. 2 of 2011 is hereby stayed,” he ruled.

Justice Kakuru’s ruling was seconded by all Judges and allowed the Court declarations and orders as they were proposed by Justice Kakuru.


Do you have a story in your community or an opinion to share with us: Email us at editorial@watchdoguganda.com

ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

President Museveni and Hon. Musasizi
News

Bunyangabu district boss says Minister Musasizi called President Museveni a liar over funding pledge

17th May 2025 at 00:07
Ms. Annet Nabirye and Hon. Esther Mbayo
News

Luuka NRM Elections: Annet Nabirye floors Mbayo again

16th May 2025 at 15:32
Mr. Odrek Rwabwogo
News

PACEID Annual Report: Uganda’s Export Drive Gains Momentum with Surge in Trade to DRC, UK and New Global Markets

16th May 2025 at 14:26
Next Post
Tamale Mirundi

Tamale Mirundi: No one should be blamed or arrested for Freedom City stampede

  • Prostitution in Uganda- Courtesy Photo

    10 dangerous hotspots known for prostitutes in Kampala

    992 shares
    Share 397 Tweet 248
  • Sudhir’s son Rajiv Ruparelia perishes in fatal motor accident 

    49 shares
    Share 20 Tweet 12
  • President Museveni proposes neutral Tororo city as compromise in Japadhola-Iteso dispute 

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Why Would Rajiv Ruparelia Be Cremated on Tuesday?

    14 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Has Billionaire Sudhir Ruparelia Replaced Rajiv with Sister Sheena in Managing the Ruparelia Group of Companies?

    17 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 4
Facebook Twitter

Contact Information

Watchdog Uganda is a portal for solution journalism, trending news plus cutting edge commentaries in the fields of politics, security, business, tourism, entertainment, technology, agriculture, climate change, environment, public health et al. We also give preference to Ugandan community news and topical discussions. The portal also publishes community news and topical discussions.

Email: editorial@watchdoguganda.com
To Advertise:Click here

Latest News

President Museveni and Hon. Musasizi

Bunyangabu district boss says Minister Musasizi called President Museveni a liar over funding pledge

17th May 2025 at 00:07
Phillip R. Ongadia

PHILLIP R. ONGADIA: Mr. Kyagulanyi aka Bobi Wine Succeeds in Building an Empire of Political Failures

16th May 2025 at 19:44

Check out

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Minister Muruli Mukasa

LIST: New salary structure for civil servants starting July 2020 out; scientists, lecturers get juicy pay rise

24th May 2020 at 10:45
Pregnant woman

Shock as 17-year old boy impregnates his two sisters during Covid-19 lockdown 

17th June 2020 at 08:17
Sudhir Ruparelia has dominated the Uganda rich list for more than a decade

Billionaire Sudhir’s wisdom on how to invest in real estate

0

How a boy’s destiny turned from cotton grower to communications guru

0
President Museveni and Hon. Musasizi

Bunyangabu district boss says Minister Musasizi called President Museveni a liar over funding pledge

17th May 2025 at 00:07
Phillip R. Ongadia

PHILLIP R. ONGADIA: Mr. Kyagulanyi aka Bobi Wine Succeeds in Building an Empire of Political Failures

16th May 2025 at 19:44

© 2025 Watchdog Uganda

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • National
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Media Outreach Newswire
    • Africa News
    • Tourism
    • Community News
    • Luganda
    • Sports
      • Football
      • Motorsport
  • Op-Ed
    • #Out2Lunch
    • Conversations with
    • Politics
    • Relationships
  • Business
    • Agriculture
    • CEOs & Entrepreneurs,
    • Companies
    • Finance
    • Products
    • RealEstate
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
  • People
    • Showbiz
      • Salon Mag
  • Special Report
    • Education
    • Voices
  • Reviews
    • Products
    • Events
    • Hotels
    • Restaurants
    • Places
  • WD-TV
  • Donate
  • China News

© 2025 Watchdog Uganda